Thursday, 23 July 2020

Reflecting on Mark's Gospel - Mark 12:13-17


The series of mutually challenging conversations with religious leaders continues as a group of them try to put Jesus in a difficult position with respect to what he says on the matter of paying taxes. The record of this encounter describes how they make an approach to Jesus in which they flatter him. Perhaps this was for the sake of the crowd. We have already been told that they are concerned about a likely adverse reaction from the people in the event that they make any attempt to prevent Jesus from continuing his ministry and teaching.

Now the tactic appears to be that they should commend him, appearing to recognise the good things he is doing and saying, but then undermine him by asking a question which will provoke him to say something that loses the sympathy of the crowd. They will then be able to move against him without the same fear of retribution.

Jesus, however, beats them at their own game with his careful and appropriate answer. He first prepares the ground by requesting a coin, a denarius. He asks whose image is on the coin and so is able to draw the conclusion that the coin belongs to the emperor whose image it bears. Of course, God has priority, but that does not mean that we have no other obligations and Jesus carefully and powerfully makes that point. Give to the emperor the things that are the emperor’s, and to God the things that are God’s.

I wonder how easily we judge our obligations to the state and to civic authorities. I wonder what bases we use to determine our attitude to the difficult issues of our day. (Jesus’ contemporaries were unhappy about having to pay taxes to the occupying Romans, which gives this incident added significance.)

In this encounter Jesus’ opponents try to force him to make a political comment, hoping that will be damaging to him. They succeed in the former aim, but not the latter. As Denis McBride (The Gospel of Mark: A Reflective Commentary) notes – “in his reply Jesus gives his own teaching, in line with traditional Judaism: it is for people to evaluate whether in demanding the poll tax, Caesar is reflecting the things of God. That evaluation, which is always a complex one, continues in every age.” I wonder how we decide what are the things on which we need to speak up or even, in some cases, engage in some form of practical action.

No comments: